Rk
1 Conestoga 6 172 24 45 7 2 0 19 13 31 3 1 .262 .317 .326
2 Durham 8 239 38 78 6 4 2 37 15 29 3 2 .326 .367 .410
3 Fanshawe 8 242 58 78 15 6 2 45 16 36 30 1 .322 .365 .459
4 Humber 8 211 37 63 13 5 1 31 23 30 19 4 .299 .366 .422
5 Mohawk 6 183 38 56 7 10 1 34 13 25 9 - .306 .355 .470
6 Seneca 8 232 34 67 5 5 2 32 10 48 8 - .289 .324 .379
7 St. Clair 4 159 51 65 9 5 - 48 6 8 7 - .409 .429 .528
Rk
1 Conestoga 6 1 0 8 56 9 - 31 31 1.00 194
2 Durham 8 2 3 5 98 12 - 46 48 .96 264
3 Fanshawe 8 1 1 3 111 23 3 25 35 .71 263
4 Humber 8 1 3 3 89 19 - 35 40 .88 241
5 Mohawk 6 1 - 3 86 18 - - - - 200
6 Seneca 8 3 2 3 88 12 - 31 38 .82 250
7 St. Clair 4 1 2 1 84 14 - 15 15 1.00 169
Rk
1 Conestoga 6 38.1 60 40 29 16 20 3.65 1 5.30
2 Durham 8 52.0 55 27 21 15 39 5.25 2 2.83
3 Fanshawe 8 54.0 72 40 29 12 58 7.52 1 3.76
4 Humber 8 56.0 37 13 11 21 40 5.00 1 1.38
5 Mohawk 6 43.0 84 58 45 11 13 2.12 1 7.33
6 Seneca 8 52.1 108 82 45 15 29 3.88 2 6.02
7 St. Clair 4 27.0 32 19 17 4 17 4.41 - 4.41
Rk
1 Conestoga 6 162 103 45 14 .914 0 14 2 .125 5 0
2 Durham 8 222 156 52 14 .937 0 6 1 .143 2 0
2 Fanshawe 8 237 162 56 19 .920 2 12 3 .200 3 0
2 Humber 8 178 115 54 9 .949 3 3 - - 1 -
5 Mohawk 6 8 - - 8 .000 - 21 - - 6 -
5 Seneca 8 191 113 37 41 .785 - 21 - - 2 -
5 St. Clair 4 65 39 14 12 .815 - 2 - - - -